Debate techniques of the damned

Sorry, that should be technique. I believe it’s called minimization and denial.

Exhibit A:

I have read the Court’s decision. Three people are not a “mob.” A mob is defined as a “large crowd.” So there was no “mob action” because there was no mob. Second, the Supreme Court specifically said the Sheriff and his deputy and a local policeman acted “under color of law.” Which means they had legal authority.*

Exhibit B:

Buchenwald, on the other hand, while atrocious beyond normal human understanding, was merely a slave labor camp, and not historically abnormal in a time of war. The people who died there did so under the stress of work and disease, rather than as a deliberate attempt to wipe them off the planet.† Which, of course, says much more about human nature and history than it does about the Nazis.

*Blatantly. Wrong.



1 Comment

Filed under Mental Health, Misguided Self-justification, Republicans and other Perverts

One response to “Debate techniques of the damned

  1. Can’t figure if that loser is as stupid as he makes himself appear, or really thinks he’s clever.